Nitwit. Clearly. She proves it over and over and over. It is so obvious she should be embarrassed. But as John Cleese recently said of Fox News, some people are just too stupid to know they are stupid.
Matt, I have been in a room with Obama three times while he spoke without a teleprompter/script. Each time he struck me as incredibly intelligent.
Let me ask you, have you ever had a similar experience with the President? Or have all of your examples of him speaking without a teleprompter been through clips without context?
My condolences regarding you past close proximity to such a horrible person. I’ve seen many example of him speaking, and seriously, the “without context” excuse doesn’t cut it. If he can’t answer a question intelligibly then I don’t need the “context” of being in the same room with him to know that he was unprepared to give an answer on the question. It’s impossible for any politician to be fully prepared for every possible question. The issue here is that people assume that Sarah Palin isn’t intelligent because she has, admittedly, been unprepared. But, that doesn’t change the fact that she’s been right many times when Obama has been so clearly wrong. That, to me, is a far more credible example of Obama’s lack of intelligence… his consistently being wrong on the issues. Now, you might counter that he says things that are essentially incorrect for political cover, but his miscalculations have cost us dearly, and one would expect more of someone who claims (or is claimed) to be an intellectual. I could also add that people that know him from academia have called Obama lazy and unqualified… but then we’re getting quite off the topic there.
Matt M. : Not sure what president you are watching but President Barrack Obama is so intelligent he was elected to the position of President of the HARVARD LAW REVIEW by his ffellow law students and you cannot argue they were all black. These boys are whiter than you and they can fucking prove it. AND THOSE WHITE LAW STUDENTS ELECTED HIM!
Matt, you rattle off a bunch of insults and vague references, but offer absolutely no substance whatsoever. How about providing an example of Palin’s brilliance or of Obama’s stupidity. I will happily refute any actual evidence you have. But as far as arguing over nonspecific references and name-calling, that simply isn’t worth anyone’s time.
While I don’t think it’s just one or the other, she is most definitely not a champion of truth in any way. What Sarah Palin has to sell is Sarah Palin. She’s clearly to even competent of her massive incompetence. She is a walking example of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Matt: I can name many champions of truth, But I gotta warn you, they are all DEMS. Your Republicans are lying bastards who are trying to sell us to their corporate puppet masters.
But you won’t believe that because you are a Koch Sucker too. I’ll bet you worl for Georgia Pacific.
MATT M. You are obviously brainwashed by the Fox News Bimbos. Bernie is very intelligent. and he speaks the truth. Your Republicans are selling us to the corporations, gutting the EPA so they can pollute your water and your air. The KOCH BROS’s Georgia pacific, Jeb Bush and GOV. Rich Scott are under investigation for letting GP dump tons of waste into a florida river. I’ll bet Megan Kelly never told you about that!!!!
SO PLEASE TELL US HOW SMART SARAH PALIN IS
Oh, this is so easy. She is a total idiot — unschooled, and badly spoken, and yet convinced of her own righteousness. What truth could she possibly be championing?
…a little of both.
She’s a bold, brainless nitwit.
Pretty asinine statement there Barry. I’m usually a pretty sarcastic bastard, but this time I’m being dead serious. Sarah is pretty nice to look at, unless of course you’d rather fantasize about the “Hotties” in your own party like….. Janet Reno, Donna Shalala, Debbie Wasserman, and Janet Napolitano.
Seems like more of an idiot savant. She seems brilliant at manipulating her own world but is totally clueless that 99.9% of us don’t live in that world. 6 years later and she still has a surprisingly ardent army of supporters, though thankfully her numbers seem to be shrinking along with her relevance.
Most politicos follow a script carefully designed for them. Sarah’s at least nice eye candy, unlike most of the Dem’s so called women.From lanzacash
“eye candy”… and there we have it. The GOP standard for public servants… Perhaps the fact that you don’t place having a high-funtioning brain highly is the problem with Conservatives… and the people that vote for them.
…and you’re kind of an ass for saying that, as well.
Once again we have old “spermhead’ here trying to put his own nonsensical spin on things. I’m just stating an obvious fact that Sarah Palin is attractive. Is it important in the grand scheme of things? No. It’s certainly not the ONLY qualification for being elected to public office, and ZenPoop knows that as well as anyone. However he’s only trying to throw his own logs of illogic onto his meaningless bonfire. Not to mention he just proved his total ignorance with his utterly retarded remark about “eye candy” as the GOP’s only standard for public servants. You really believe that? I think even Hillbillary would laugh at that one. Give it up shit for brains…..You’ve already lost what little credibility you already had.
My credibility certainly doesn’t come from lower forms of life, such as you.
I’m not saying that I’m not impressed that you’ve eventually found a way to stand upright and type while holding a club. The gibberish you type, of course, makes no sense, but it’s still somewhat of a minor miracle. When you’re done flinging your poop onto this and other thread walls, perhaps then, you can relax and go back to your first love: lighting ants on fire with your magnifying glass.
ZenPoop, (Sigh) Give it up already. We all know you’re an idiot. You don’t have to prove to us anymore that you were oxygen deprived at birth, we believe it already. When are you going to finally get tired of having me kicking sand in your face? Christ, you’re a glutton for punishment. Lighting ants on fire with a magnifying glass? HUH? That doesn’t even make sense, even coming from a brain impaired waste of life like you. On the other hand, if reincarnation really does exist, coming back as a scorched insect would be an upgrade for you. Do us a favor ZenPoop, insert your head into a blender and make yourself a nice refreshing Feces Smoothie.
“we all know”… lol.
Helplessly trapped in your reality-free bubble. Some day you’ll get out, Lanzer… you keep trying and one day, maybe you can put your big boy pants on, instead of wetting your diapers. Probably not. But it could happen.
Now I’ve gotta go back to the grownup table. You sit here, wipe your nose, play nice & eat your vegetables.
Dumb as a bag of rocks. Even the Republican party has finally turned on her for being the embarrassment she is.
On the other hand, she’s really good at self-promotion and keeping herself in the news in order to stay “relevant” so she can continue to get paid for speaking engagements, reality shows, books, etc etc. More likely she has a handler who is good at that.
Perhaps, but a person’s looks don’t exactly qualify them for office.
And let’s flip that statement so you can see for yourself how absurd it is.
“Oh, I voted for Obama instead of Romney because he’s way easier on the eyes.”
At least, I HOPE people don’t vote for candidates based on their looks.
(ps. for the record, I went indie last election and didn’t vote for either Obama or Romney)
Um, it was a hypothetical example. Let me try again. “I’d vote for John Edwards over George Bush any day because he’s so much better looking!”
Again, STUPID reason to vote or not vote for a candidate. And, I’m being polite and not even blasting you for the blatant sexism. We never appraise male candidates over their looks. Obviously a person’s appearance has nothing to do with their ability to hold public office. If it did, Abe Lincoln, the homeliest man on earth, would have been a terrible President, not one of the greats.
My “blatant sexism”? Excuse me Joyce, but Gloria Steinem just called and asked if she could pay a visit to you in 1973. I merely stated that Sarah Palin is very attractive, unlike most of the pigs in the Dem party. As for your claims of sexism, it works both ways. A large chunk of women admitted voting for JFK primarily because they thought he was better looking than Nixon.
Well Zen, perhaps if you didn’t eat so many paint chips as a child you would’ve picked up on what I was trying to convey to Joyce. Since you sound like someone who has only recently learned to read and write I can understand if you’re easily confused, and how certain unorthodox methods of ribbing people, and poking good natured fun at them would go over your fattening, little head. Since this wasn’t written in phonetics, I’m not sure if you’ll make it all the way to the closing period without assistance, but I’ll take the slim to none chance that you’ll somehow persevere and make it all the way through.
oh, but I DO understand. Just like we ALL understand what a failed comedian you are. Your tinfoil hat scribblings on here give you away. Perhaps you’d like to respond AGAIN about how ugly Democratic women are? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Conservative humor, ladies and gentlemen!
That’s okay. Turn on Fox “News” continue your unabated tapping.
Well ZenPoop, we all understand that you’re an imbecile, although I have to admit your “tinfoil hat scribblings” (whatever the hell that’s supposed to mean?) remark does show some slight promise in your intellectual advancement. I’m not too sure how much credence we should give to your “failed comedian” quip, since you strike us as the guy who laughs uproariously on Tuesday mornings, because you’re just getting the jokes told on Saturday night. Not that it’s really that important to anyone, except you apparently, I’ll respond again. Yes, a huge percentage, but not all, of democrat women are pretty ugly. However if you’re the type that has wet dreams over Debbie Wasserman (or is it really Dee Snyder?) Janet Reno, Donna Shalala, and the other “beauties” in the dem party, well that’s just something that I’d think you’d want to keep a secret, and not share with anyone. “HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA”!!!
She’s neither — she was a creation of Lorne Michaels to catapult Tina Fey’s career and strengthen the female performers on SNL.
Oh wait, that’s what I had hoped so I wouldn’t have to deal with the truth — that someone that ridiculous and uneducated could capture any attention of meaningful and thoughtful people.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.