All men should die

Updated on December 16, 2021 in Issues
21 on April 2, 2021

🙂

  • Liked by
Reply
0 on April 3, 2021

tf

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
1 on April 4, 2021

i’m a man i wish you’d come take me out of my misery men have it tough yeah women have babies but as a man why do i have so much weight on my shoulders why can’t it be evenly distributed

on May 19, 2021

Then who’s gonna be your daddy sis?

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
0 on May 21, 2021

78% of suicides in the US are white males, so the data supports your hypothesis. Sorry someone hurt you.

Sincerely,
A person who cares. 🙂

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
0 on August 9, 2021

Those bone marrows wont do you much and we would lose a bunch of the population so no men should NOT die someone gotta put a sperm in your coochie so you can reproduce.

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
0 on September 6, 2021

fuck u

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
0 on September 6, 2021
  1. we create in this world to complement each other 
  2. if there is no men, u can’t be you are now
  3. fuck your self
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
4 on October 24, 2021

Stay mad lol

on November 1, 2021

Your dad allowed your mother conception of the person you are; He gave you life, you want him dead.

on November 3, 2021

I’m not sure you replied to the right person. I’m laughing at OP with this post.

on November 4, 2021

damn wrong person lol , sos

on November 6, 2021

All good lol, I’m happy to see people like you on this platform

 

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
5 on November 1, 2021

Man, I love arguing.

Well, in this topic it ominously states, and I quote, “All men should die.” Now, to you this thought may be what ‘tickles your fancy’, however, if all men were to simply drop dead it would have serious implications and repercussions. For starters, 88% of billionaires are men, seeing as they control large scale industrial corporations it would be catastrophic for them to pass away. Also, seeing as men also account for up to 74% of the labour force, it would mean that the remaining 46.9% of women would have to reach the output and production the void of ‘manpower’- pun intended- has left behind. If this seems like a lot of key points then I’d be happy to tell you that I’ve only covered a mere portion of the industrial implications this crisis would cause.

 

TLDR; Having men dying would crash the economy, stock market, and industry.

on November 2, 2021

I agree. I like how you added statistics to form your argument. The best part about your paragraph is how you say you love arguing but that you’re still respectful. Some people are not able to do that.

on November 3, 2021

These replies are both nonsensical. This isn’t a proper presentation of statistics and it shouldn’t be praised. First, I love to argue too, and I agree with Luzao’s ultimate point. They way you make it though is terrible.

The biggest failure is assuming that the proportion of women in the workforce wouldn’t increase if men vanished from the workforce. Obviously this 46.9% statistic, wherever it came from, isn’t necessary here and takes more away from your point than it adds to it. You’re getting overly technical about a simple argument.

The crux of this whole thing is that eliminating half of the current workforce (the half more predisposed to hard labor) is terrible economically. However, even in getting here you’re making a mistake in taking the bait.

The post is open ended in a purposeful way. Narrowing it down to a purely economic argument is handwaving any other possibility. To engage with this sort of bait that leaves itself all kinds of potential pivots is to take a softer initial approach that leaves you similar options. For example, you can troll back, or to tackle directly you could simply state that men provide tremendous social utility (purposely vaguely) and ask for positive arguments for all men dying. Don’t latch on to nothing because you can trap yourself in an economic argument against someone coming from moralism.

on November 4, 2021

Thanks bud, i’m getting tips for free 😀

No, in all seriousness I agree with every critique shown before me, but, I am purposely being very direct in a certain aspect of the topic technically and jokingly, I’ll explain. The topic shown before me was stated pretty vaguely saying, “all men should die.” It doesn’t really explain much. The only thing I wasn’t too lazy to write about the economical side of things. Also, when you talked about other women joining the workforce due to the absence of manpower-again, pun intended- you forgot to mention about the absence of leadership.

“Hey, if the boss of your company was a girl then congratulations! She’s still alive to take care of the company. Wait, The dudes who were the head of advertisement and director of finance are both gone? Bummer, I guess we have to replace him, but with who?”

You guessed it! With the lack of manpower needed to fill in for positions in which are empty women would get drafted into manufacturing and industry like a Soviet to the fields. However, since most of these positions are mainly maintained by men and that those conscripts would most likely lack the skill for those areas you can imagine how dire the situation would become. And regarding my last topic, men are also a large part of the global economy; hardwired into them and interweaved globally. You can have a dude from Shanghai who half the shares of Google, a man from Egypt who directly supervises the Suez Canal or even a guy from Rio De Janeiro whose parent company consistently maintains the monopoly over South America. Now, what do you think would happen to all of these industries if you remove the key figure? What of Truck drives who manages the flow of food from the farms or warehouses to the wholesaler? What of the farmers who toil the land for crops to grow in the first place? And what would happen if these were to be gone? Famine and Mass Starvation. Sure they can conscript women farmers to take up the jobs of those gone but lets face it, they most likely wouldn’t know how to manage the farm properly and wouldn’t be able to meet the deadline in which men would.

TL;DR Still, it doesn’t matter that you can conscript women into the workforce, what matters is that they wouldn’t know how to because men usually do those jobs and because of a skill shortage.

on November 6, 2021

So, I like your willingness to engage with my critique, but I think you missed the point of it my friend. 

 

My critique is not that your extrapolation of the topic is invalid, it is that you are making a mistake in extrapolating upon something so vague in the first place. 

 

So, I’m not saying that, assuming your assumptions about how “all men should die” are correct, you are wrong in your analysis.

What I’m saying is that you’re making assumptions about how that will take place before your opponent is presenting them to you. You seem to be assuming that OP is suggesting that all men should just off themselves at once, and to be charitable to OP, I would say that’s a pretty ridiculous idea for anyone to have. They would probably say “men should accept that they should die and phase themselves out in the way that helps along the matriarchal society as best as possible before becoming purely mating livestock.” 

 

Responding to this reveals your mistake. Obviously nobody would argue for the instantaneous deletion of most major business leaders, and therefore you’re just spinning your wheels responding to this hypothetical you’ve created for yourself. 

 

You’re better off just saying “you’re wrong. men are dope. prove me wrong.”

 

Again, I hope you take this in the good faith in which it is intended.

on November 6, 2021

Ight thankq, i’m taking all the tips for arguing atm. I’m not going to take this in a bad manner, I see this as a way to expand my knowledge and strategic engagement (How to argue better, lol).

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
1 on November 2, 2021

No. If all men die, reproduction would be hard. With all of the sperm that we currently have (not inside of men’s bodies), it would be possible to live without men (for a short while at least). But even if we did, eventually more men would be born and you can’t really prevent that. All men dying would also reduce the amount of people working and lots of people would lose money. You would also lose your dad, boyfriend, son, father, uncle, teacher, etc. It’s not humane to kill anyone especially if it’s categorized by something you can’t control. I understand that you may not like men or that something must’ve happened but killing all men could result in things that are irreversible, and I don’t think “killing all men” is the best solution.

on November 3, 2021

You’re making a fatal attribution error here. They purposely haven’t said anything about “killing” anyone. Applying this to the OP leaves you in a precarious position. Much like Luzao, you’re trapping yourself in one narrow vein of argumentation. What if they’re saying “all men SHOULD die, but no one is going to make them because that would be just as morally bad as men continuing to exist.”

Also I would recommend staying away from things like reproduction because it just gets messy without digging much into the main point. However, it can be fun if done in good faith so ill pose a hypothetical.

‘Obviously we can’t use what we have now to guarantee that lab births wouldn’t produce more males, but they can easily be relegated to a secondary citizen class more similar to livestock than anything else. If the all-women society implemented this, would that circumvent your point about reproduction?’

Only put it in quotes to show I’m just asking the question, even though I don’t agree with it necessarily.

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
0 on December 16, 2021

Um I’m pretty this is a joke, but no, all men shouldn’t die. I’m a woman who has been hurt by plenty of men, but I don’t relate the ill-natured of their small minds to their gender. It’s just sexist and weird. Why specifically should we take out an entire gender? 

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
Loading more replies