Sarah Palin: Bold Speaker of Truth or Brainless Nitwit?

Updated on February 27, 2015 in Politics
105 on January 27, 2015

Argue away!

  • Liked by
Reply
34 on January 29, 2015

Nitwit. Clearly. She proves it over and over and over. It is so obvious she should be embarrassed. But as John Cleese recently said of Fox News, some people are just too stupid to know they are stupid.

on February 9, 2015

If she’s a nitwit, then Obama is brain dead. Ever hear him talk when he isn’t reading off a teleprompter… scary stupid…

on February 9, 2015

She’s a brainless speaker of her truth.  And she shouldn’t have quite being governor of Alaska.

on February 10, 2015

I agree she shouldn’t have quit.

on February 10, 2015

She quit as Governor to avoid prosecution.

on February 11, 2015

She quit because her new-found fame made her a constant target of the state’s Democratic Party, making it impossible to govern.

on February 11, 2015

Matt, I have been in a room with Obama three times while he spoke without a teleprompter/script. Each time he struck me as incredibly intelligent.

Let me ask you, have you ever had a similar experience with the President? Or have all of your examples of him speaking without a teleprompter been through clips without context?

on February 11, 2015

My condolences regarding you past close proximity to such a horrible person.  I’ve seen many example of him speaking, and seriously, the “without context” excuse doesn’t cut it. If he can’t answer a question intelligibly then I don’t need the “context” of being in the same room with him to know that he was unprepared to give an answer on the question. It’s impossible for any politician to be fully prepared for every possible question. The issue here is that people assume that Sarah Palin isn’t intelligent because she has, admittedly, been unprepared. But, that doesn’t change the fact that she’s been right many times when Obama has been so clearly wrong. That, to me, is a far more credible example of Obama’s lack of intelligence… his consistently being wrong on the issues. Now, you might counter that he says things that are essentially incorrect for political cover, but his miscalculations have cost us dearly, and one would expect more of someone who claims (or is claimed) to be an intellectual. I could also add that people that know him from academia have called Obama lazy and unqualified… but then we’re getting quite off the topic there.

on February 11, 2015

Matt M. :  Not sure what president you are watching but President Barrack Obama is so intelligent he was elected to the position of President of the HARVARD LAW REVIEW by his ffellow law students and you cannot argue they were all black. These boys are whiter than you and they can fucking prove it.  AND THOSE WHITE LAW STUDENTS ELECTED HIM!
SO  stfu

on February 11, 2015

Matt, you rattle off a bunch of insults and vague references, but offer absolutely no substance whatsoever. How about providing an example of Palin’s brilliance or of Obama’s stupidity. I will happily refute any actual evidence you have. But as far as arguing over nonspecific references and name-calling, that simply isn’t worth anyone’s time.

on February 11, 2015

Barry, imagine that… a bunch of white people at a liberal school voting for a unqualified black guy… Kind of reminds me of some recent national elections.

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
1 on January 29, 2015

When you can be stumped by a trick question like, “What do you read?”.  YOU ARE QUEEN OF THE NITWITS.

on February 9, 2015

Love it.

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
17 on February 9, 2015

While I don’t think it’s just one or the other, she is most definitely not a champion of truth in any way. What Sarah Palin has to sell is Sarah Palin. She’s clearly to even competent of her massive incompetence. She is a walking example of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

on February 10, 2015

Can you tell me one politician that is a champion of truth?

on February 10, 2015

No. Sarah Palin would tell you that she is a champion of truth, and from what I can tell really believes it about herself.

on February 10, 2015

Matt: I can name many champions of truth, But I gotta warn you, they are all DEMS.  Your Republicans are lying bastards who are trying to sell us to their corporate puppet masters.

But you won’t believe that because you are a Koch Sucker too.  I’ll bet you worl for Georgia Pacific.

on February 11, 2015

Go ahead, name one Democrat who is a champion of truth… not their own, but real truth. You can’t.

on February 11, 2015

I just attended a speech by Bernie Sanders… it was overbrimming with truth.

on February 11, 2015

Good lord… So you think Bernie Sanders is a champion of truth and Obama is intelligent… well, that explains so much….

on February 11, 2015

MATT M.  You are obviously brainwashed by the Fox News Bimbos.  Bernie is very intelligent. and he speaks the truth.  Your Republicans are selling us to the corporations, gutting the EPA so they can pollute your water and your air.  The KOCH BROS’s Georgia pacific, Jeb Bush and GOV. Rich Scott are under investigation for letting GP dump tons of waste into a florida river.   I’ll bet Megan Kelly never told you about that!!!!

SO PLEASE TELL US HOW SMART SARAH PALIN IS

on February 11, 2015

Wow, Barry… the only thing missing from your absurd rant was blaming Bush43 for Obama’s failures.

on February 11, 2015

Obama has no failures.  Bush boy on the other hand has warrants out for his arrest all over europe.  He is a murdering asshole and Obama has been cleaning up his mess for over 6 years.

on February 11, 2015

Now I know you’re just saying silly things to provoke reaction… Because you can’t actually believe what you just wrote.

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
1 on February 9, 2015

NITWIT. I can see dangerous ignorance from my arm chair.

on February 10, 2015

Do you mean Palin or Obama?

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
2 on February 9, 2015

Oh, this is so easy. She is a total idiot — unschooled, and badly spoken, and yet convinced of her own righteousness.  What truth could she possibly be championing?

on February 10, 2015

Don’t you know ALL politicians are full of shit by now?  Sarah’s at least cute to look at, unlike most liberal women.

on February 17, 2015

Eh, she stopped being cute years ago.  Now she’s just annoying.

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
5 on February 10, 2015

…a little of both. 

She’s a bold, brainless nitwit.

on February 10, 2015

But she’s a hot little cutie.

on February 11, 2015

eye candy? She’s a grandmother.

on February 11, 2015

I think Lanzacash is saying she’s a “GILF”

on February 11, 2015

I think Lanzacash was being sarcastic.  But Republicans are too stupid to understand sarcasm.

on February 11, 2015

Pretty asinine statement there Barry. I’m usually a pretty sarcastic bastard, but this time I’m being dead serious. Sarah is pretty nice to look at, unless of course you’d rather fantasize about the “Hotties” in your own party like….. Janet Reno, Donna Shalala, Debbie Wasserman, and Janet Napolitano.

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
9 on February 10, 2015

Seems like more of an idiot savant.  She seems brilliant at manipulating her own world but is totally clueless that 99.9% of us don’t live in that world.  6 years later and she still has a surprisingly ardent army of supporters, though thankfully her numbers seem to be shrinking along with her relevance.

on February 10, 2015

Most politicos follow a script carefully designed for them. Sarah’s at least nice eye candy, unlike most of the Dem’s so called women.

on February 15, 2015
Most politicos follow a script carefully designed for them. Sarah’s at least nice eye candy, unlike most of the Dem’s so called women.From lanzacash

 
“eye candy”… and there we have it. The GOP standard for public servants… Perhaps the fact that you don’t place having a high-funtioning brain highly is the problem with Conservatives… and the people that vote for them. 

…and you’re kind of an ass for saying that, as well.

on February 15, 2015

Once again we have old “spermhead’ here trying to put his own nonsensical spin on things. I’m just stating an obvious fact that Sarah Palin is attractive. Is it important in the grand scheme of things? No. It’s certainly not the ONLY qualification for being elected to public office, and ZenPoop knows that as well as anyone. However he’s only trying to throw his own logs of illogic onto his meaningless bonfire. Not to mention he just proved his total ignorance with his utterly retarded remark about “eye candy” as the GOP’s only standard for public servants. You really believe that? I think even Hillbillary would laugh at that one. Give it up shit for brains…..You’ve already lost what little credibility you already had.

on February 16, 2015

My credibility certainly doesn’t come from lower forms of life, such as you. 
I’m not saying that I’m not impressed that you’ve eventually found a way to stand upright and type while holding a club. The gibberish you type, of course, makes no sense, but it’s still somewhat of a minor miracle. When you’re done flinging your poop onto this and other thread walls, perhaps then, you can relax and go back to your first love: lighting ants on fire with your magnifying glass.

on February 16, 2015

…and Palin’s every utterance renders her uglier and uglier by the minute.

on February 16, 2015

ZenPoop, (Sigh) Give it up already. We all know you’re an idiot. You don’t have to prove to us anymore that you were oxygen deprived at birth, we believe it already. When are you going to finally get tired of having me kicking sand in your face? Christ, you’re a glutton for punishment. Lighting ants on fire with a magnifying glass? HUH? That doesn’t even make sense, even coming from a brain impaired waste of life like you. On the other hand, if reincarnation really does exist, coming back as a scorched insect would be an upgrade for you. Do us a favor ZenPoop, insert your head into a blender and make yourself a nice refreshing Feces Smoothie.

on February 16, 2015

“we all know”… lol. 

Helplessly trapped in your reality-free bubble. Some day you’ll get out, Lanzer… you keep trying and one day, maybe you can put your big boy pants on, instead of wetting your diapers. Probably not. But it could happen. 

Now I’ve gotta go back to the grownup table. You sit here, wipe your nose, play nice & eat your vegetables.

on February 16, 2015

Hey “Tampon Tongue,” you’ve already proven that your parents are probably first cousins with each other. Now go back to your high powered career of sucking farts out of seats in movie theatres..

on February 17, 2015

you’re funny for all the wrong reasons. bye bye.

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
16 on February 10, 2015

Dumb as a bag of rocks. Even the Republican party has finally turned on her for being the embarrassment she is.
On the other hand, she’s really good at self-promotion and keeping herself in the news in order to stay “relevant” so she can continue to get paid for speaking engagements, reality shows, books, etc etc. More likely she has a handler who is good at that.

on February 10, 2015

But at least she’s easy on the eyes unlike most liberal women in politics.

on February 10, 2015

Perhaps, but a person’s looks don’t exactly qualify them for office.
And let’s flip that statement so you can see for yourself how absurd it is.
“Oh, I voted for Obama instead of Romney because he’s way easier on the eyes.”
At least, I HOPE people don’t vote for candidates based on their looks.
(ps. for the record, I went indie last election and didn’t vote for either Obama or Romney)

on February 11, 2015

Anyone who thinks Obama is better looking than Romney must have severe cataracts.

on February 11, 2015

Um, it was a hypothetical example. Let me try again. “I’d vote for John Edwards over George Bush any day because he’s so much better looking!”
Again, STUPID reason to vote or not vote for a candidate. And, I’m being polite and not even blasting you for the blatant sexism. We never appraise male candidates over their looks. Obviously a person’s appearance has nothing to do with their ability to hold public office. If it did, Abe Lincoln, the homeliest man on earth, would have been a terrible President, not one of the greats.

on February 11, 2015

My “blatant sexism”? Excuse me Joyce, but Gloria Steinem just called and asked if she could pay a visit to you in 1973. I merely stated that Sarah Palin is very attractive, unlike most of the pigs in the Dem party. As for your claims of sexism, it works both ways. A large chunk of women admitted voting for JFK primarily because they thought he was better looking than Nixon.

on February 12, 2015

Congrats lanzacash… might be the dumbest thing I’ve read today… and I’ve read a lot of your posts. Criticizing Joyce by referencing something in 1973… then defends himself by pointing at 1960. Hilarious.

on February 12, 2015

Well Zen, perhaps if you didn’t eat so many paint chips as a child you would’ve picked up on what I was trying to convey to Joyce. Since you sound like someone who has only recently learned to read and write I can understand if you’re easily confused, and how certain unorthodox methods of ribbing people, and poking good natured fun at them would go over your fattening, little head. Since this wasn’t written in phonetics, I’m not sure if you’ll make it all the way to the closing period without assistance, but I’ll take the slim to none chance that you’ll somehow persevere and make it all the way through.

on February 15, 2015

oh, but I DO understand. Just like we ALL understand what a failed comedian you are. Your tinfoil hat scribblings on here give you away. Perhaps you’d like to respond AGAIN about how ugly Democratic women are? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Conservative humor, ladies and gentlemen!  

That’s okay. Turn on Fox “News” continue your unabated tapping.

on February 15, 2015

Well ZenPoop, we all understand that you’re an imbecile, although I have to admit your “tinfoil hat scribblings” (whatever the hell that’s supposed to mean?) remark does show some slight promise in your intellectual advancement. I’m not too sure how much credence we should give to your “failed comedian” quip, since you strike us as the guy who laughs uproariously on Tuesday mornings, because you’re just getting the jokes told on Saturday night. Not that it’s really that important to anyone, except you apparently, I’ll respond again. Yes, a huge percentage, but not all, of democrat women are pretty ugly. However if you’re the type that has wet dreams over Debbie Wasserman (or is it really Dee Snyder?) Janet Reno, Donna Shalala, and the other “beauties” in the dem party, well that’s just something that I’d think you’d want to keep a secret, and not share with anyone. “HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA”!!!

on February 15, 2015

Hey ZenPoop, got some great news for you. While dem. Rosa DeLauro was turned down for the Ava Gardner movie, I hear she’s up for the lead role in “THE KEITH RICHARDS STORY” Oh Happy Day….

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
0 on February 11, 2015

She’s neither — she was a creation of Lorne Michaels to catapult Tina Fey’s career and strengthen the female performers on SNL.

Oh wait, that’s what I had hoped so I wouldn’t have to deal with the truth — that someone that ridiculous and uneducated could capture any attention of meaningful and thoughtful people.

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
0 on February 11, 2015

Oh give me a break. It’s not like she’s not the greatest thing to come out of Alaska since Baked Atlanta. Could there be anything more exciting then watching her attempt to match wits with a new-in-box vintage Speak-n-Spell?

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
Loading more replies